Menu
Accueil
Forums
Nouveaux messages
En ce moment
Nouveaux messages
Nouveaux messages de profil
Connexion
S'inscrire
Quoi de neuf
Nouveaux messages
Menu
Connexion
S'inscrire
Forums
Catégorie Principale
Actualités françaises
Le pen que de la gueule et mobilisons nous contre tafta
JavaScript est désactivé. Pour une meilleure expérience, veuillez activer JavaScript dans votre navigateur avant de continuer.
Vous utilisez un navigateur obsolète. Il se peut que ce site ou d'autres sites Web ne s'affichent pas correctement.
Vous devez le mettre à jour ou utiliser un
navigateur alternatif
.
Répondre à la discussion
Message
[QUOTE="droitreponse, post: 13756438, member: 377946"] Je mets in extenso ce qu'a voté contre toute attente le parlement en dépit de ses dires précédents : [B]In a significant omission, one of the European Parliament's key committees, INTA, has not called for the rejection of the controversial investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism in its TTIP report, which will be voted on by the full European Parliament on June 10[/B]. Although neither today's vote, nor the plenary next month, has any direct effect on the negotiations, it is regarded as an indicator of the mood of the MEPs, and of how any eventual vote on ratifying TTIP might go. [B]The second-largest party in the European Parliament, the Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group, published a position paper on ISDS back in March, which said: "we have made it clear that we do not see a need for its inclusion and have called for it to be excluded when negotiations for the investment chapter start."[/B] It appears that S&D MEPs initially held onto this position in INTA, but as the result of what the Greens MEP Michel Reimon calls a "dirty last-minute deal" between the main political parties, they voted to drop all mention of ISDS from the committee's final report. Instead, the text adopted by the committee speaks of trusting "the courts of the EU and of the Member States and of the United States to provide effective legal protection based on the principle of democratic legitimacy, efficiently and in a cost-effective manner," without specifying how that will happen if ISDS is available for companies to ignore those courts and to sue countries directly using secret tribunals. The INTA report also speaks of building on a concept paper presented by Cecilia Malmström, the EU Commissioner responsible for trade and thus TTIP, in which she proposed some solutions for ISDS's problems. Finally, the report advocates setting up a new public International Investment Court, which would replace the current tribunal system. ive US-EU treaty that undermines democracy A boost for national economies, or a Trojan Horse for corporations? These are vague, long-term ideas, and they don't address what will happen in the TTIP negotiations happening now. [B]The report's failure to call for ISDS to be excluded from the negotiations, as requested by 145,000 people who took part in an EU consultation on ISDS last year, means the mechanism is implicitly still on the table.[/B] The big question is whether the bulk of the S&D MEPs will try to reverse the policy of the report, and vote against ISDS on 10 June, or whether they will acquiesce in their colleagues' U-turn. Expect to see heavy lobbying from both the pro- and anti-ISDS camps in the run up to that important European Parliament vote. [/QUOTE]
Insérer les messages sélectionnés…
Vérification
Répondre
Forums
Catégorie Principale
Actualités françaises
Le pen que de la gueule et mobilisons nous contre tafta
Haut