Voila ce que notre ami kabulane affirmait
N'importe quoi! Il y a plein d’études sur la question. La conclusion est claire: Les scientifiques les plus prestigieux rejettent dieu.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html
Petite recherche plus tard et réponse de ma part :
Voila un lien qui explique que cette conclusion est biaisée (et malhonnete) :
http://ncse.com/rncse/18/2/do-scientists-really-reject-god
Citation:
Larson and Witham also asked the AM&WS sample a second set of questions, repeating a survey performed in 1914 by sociologist James H Leuba. Leuba had found that, in contrast to the high levels of religious belief in the general American public, scientists exhibited low levels of belief in God. He predicted that over time, more and more scientists would give up their belief in God, as scientific knowledge replaced what he considered to be superstition.
Larson and Witham found to the contrary that disbelief among scientists remained stable: 58% in 1914 and 60% in 1976 (Larson and Witham 1997).
La conclusion :
The title of the recent Larson and Witham article in Nature, "Leading scientists still reject God" is premature without reliable data upon which to base it.
Voila la rigueur scientifique de notre ami kabulane qui offre des preuves qui finalement démontrent le contraire de son affirmation
Et maintenant il me ressort de nouveaux liens comme si j'avais encore du temps à perdre ^^
J'ai rarement vu autant de violence et de mauvaise foi chez un personnage qui prétend dénoncer le caractère supposée violent de l'islam.
Allez zou charlatan !!
