Attention, ce lien offre une lecture assez partisane d'un lobby qui défend justement les intérêts du Maroc et reprend ce que dit le Maroc depuis des années ie "autonomie sous souveraineté marocaine".
Pourtant, dans un autre texte plus vieux, celui ci plus "objectif", l'on note :
"The resolution welcomes Morocco’s “serious and credible ... efforts to move the process towards
resolution”. The context and the relevance of retaining this phrase have changed. This phrase has, unfortunately, led to dest ructive ambiguity and has resulted in some unfortunately interpreting the Council’s intention as favouring one proposal over the other. My delegation reiterates our understanding, as a Council member that was part of the negotiations on
the text of resolution 1754 (2007), that the text of the resolution is clear, that the Council takes note of both proposals and that the Council called on the parties to enter into negotiations based on both of these proposals. Any attempt to place one proposal above the other would undermine the negotiations process and would be counterproductive to the spirit of future
negotiations based on these two proposals. The Council and the Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General should remain objective without pre-empting any final status of the negotiations"
"The resolution does, however, call on the parties — Frente POLISARIO and Morocco — to continue where the negotiations began after the adoption of resolution 1754 (2007), on the basis of the two proposals"
Source :
http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/{65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9}/Western Sahara SPV5884.pdf